Gender Differences in Research Productivity of Academic Physicians Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objective: The gendered impact of the COVID-19 on scientific productivity has been primarily studied in nonclinical academic fields. We investigated the gendered effect of the pandemic on diverse measures of research participation among physician faculty, who experienced an increase in clinical duties concomitant with pandemic-era challenges to research. Materials and Methods: Physician faculty employed in both 2019 (prepandemic) and 2021 (pandemic era) were identified at one U.S. medical school. Annual outcomes included scientific publications, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocols, and extramural funding submissions (funding data were unavailable for 2019). Mixed-effects Poisson regression models compared the pandemic impact by gender. Results: The study included 105 women and 116 men, contributing to 122 publications, 214 IRB protocols, and 99 extramural funding applications. Controlling for potential confounders such as faculty rank and track (tenure vs. nontenure), women's publication count increased by 140% during the pandemic (95% confidence interval [CI]: +40% to +310%, p = 0.001) but was unchanged among men (95% CI: -30% to +50%; p > 0.999). The number of IRB protocols decreased from 2019 to 2021, but to a greater extent among men than women. In 2021, there was no gender difference in the number of extramural funding submissions. Conclusions: Among physician faculty at our medical school, women achieved parity with men on multiple measures of scholarly activity, and women's research productivity outpaced that of men in the same faculty track and rank. Targeted initiatives to support research among women faculty, junior investigators, and clinical investigators may have helped avert exacerbation of prepandemic gender disparities in research participation.

Telemedicine and Disparities in Visit Attendance at a Rural Pediatric Primary Care Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Objective. To determine whether the introduction of telemedicine at a rural pediatric clinic was associated with reduced disparities in visit attendance. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all clinic visits from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021. Visit types were divided into telemedicine visits, in-person urgent, and in-person non-urgent visits. Visits were stratified into periods based on the statewide pandemic response. Results. A total of 8,412 patients with 54,746 scheduled visits were analyzed. Visits were less likely to be completed for older patients, Black patients, and patients with Medicaid insurance than their counterparts. Despite a pandemic-era increase in telemedicine utilization, disparities in visit completion that were present in the pre-pandemic era persisted after stay-at-home orders were lifted. Discussion. The adoption of telemedicine did not reduce pre-existing disparities in visit attendance. Further work is needed to identify the reasons for the disparities and improve visit attendance of historically disadvantaged patient populations.

In-person school attendance and adolescent exposure to injury-related risk behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

School closures during the COVID-19 pandemic have been reported to influence adolescents' behavioral health and may have altered their exposure to injury risk. We aimed to determine how in-person school attendance of individual adolescents in the United States during the pandemic was correlated with a range of risky health behaviors. We used self-reported data from adolescents 14-18 years old enrolled in grades 9-12 who participated in the 2020 Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey. The exposure of interest was in-person vs remote school attendance in the previous 30 days. Risk behavior outcomes included not wearing a seatbelt when riding in a car; riding with someone who was drinking and driving; suffering intimate partner violence (IPV); forced sexual encounters; suicidal ideation; suicidal planning; electronic bullying; gun carrying; and physical fighting. Based on a multivariable analysis of 5202 students (65% attending school in-person) adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, parental unemployment, food insecurity, and homelessness, we found that in-person school attendance was associated with increased odds of every risk behavior except suicidal ideation and electronic bullying, with adjusted odds ratios ranging from 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04, 1.88) for not wearing a seatbelt to 3.43 for IPV (95% CI: 1.97, 5.97). Our analyses demonstrate that in-person school attendance during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with higher rates of risk behavior among adolescents. Further research is needed explore if this relationship is causal, and how these risks could be mitigated, as most adolescents have now returned to in-person schooling.

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Deployed Personnel in a Joint Environment.

INTRODUCTION: In the United States, vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a major barrier to vaccination against COVID-19, but attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination among military personnel are not well understood. We evaluated the prevalence and correlates of COVID-19 vaccine consent or refusal among deployed personnel in a joint environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Deidentified data were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record of the Military Health System in May 2021. All personnel currently assigned to the deployment area of operations were included in the analysis if their choice to receive the vaccine was known. Personnel characteristics were compared by vaccine acceptance status using chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, or correlation coefficients. This analysis was exempted from Institutional Review Board review. RESULTS: The sample included 1,809 individuals, primarily members of the Army (72%) and members of Reserve (53%) or National Guard (27%) units. In the overall sample, 61% accepted the vaccine, with vaccine acceptance rates being lowest among Black or African American personnel (54%; P = .03 for comparison across racial groups) and members of Reserve or National Guard units (59%; P < .001 for comparison by component). No differences in vaccine acceptance were found according to sex or health status (including prior COVID-19 infection). CONCLUSIONS: Overall vaccine acceptance was greater among deployed military personnel than that reported in the U.S. population as a whole. However, lower vaccine acceptance among personnel from marginalized populations suggests a need to ensure that all service members have sufficient opportunities to have a frank and ongoing discussion with health care providers to address concerns related to vaccination. Additionally, lower vaccine acceptance among Reserve and National Guard personnel indicates a need for innovative educational approaches to counter vaccine hesitancy in the premobilization phase of deployment.

Shelter in Place and an Alarming Increase in Penetrating Trauma in Children and Concerning Decrease in Child Abuse.

BACKGROUND: On March 14, 2020, schools across North Carolina (NC) closed in response to Covid-19, forcing completion of the school year at home. Most pediatric trauma occurs at home with a higher prevalence when children are out of school. We queried the state trauma database to assess if the 2020 "shelter in place" was associated with an increase in pediatric trauma statewide. METHODS: The NC trauma database was queried for injuries in children (age < 18 yrs) from 13 March-1 August 2020, and the corresponding months of 2018 and 2019. The number and type of injuries were compared. We also queried the NC death certificate and child welfare databases. Data were analyzed by standard statistical methods using chi-squared or Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Total pediatric trauma cases were lower during 2020 (71.6 per 100,000) compared to 2018 (92.4 per 100,000) and 2019 (80 per 100,000) (P < .001); however, average injury severity score (ISS) was higher (P = .001). A significant increase in firearm injuries were seen in 2020 (P = .016), with an increase in mortality (P = .08) and ISS (P = .013). The rate of child abuse trauma decreased in 2020 (P = .005) as did the number of child abuse and neglect reports (P < .001). There were also significant decreases in trauma due to sports, burns, falls, and motor vehicle accidents. CONCLUSION: While overall pediatric trauma decreased during the Covid-19 pandemic, there was an alarming increase in penetrating injuries in children. Child abuse trauma and reports decreased, which is concerning for lower identification of abuse.

Nation-wide decrease in the prevalence of pediatric chronic pain during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic was expected to increase prevalence and severity of chronic pain. We compared pandemic-era and pre-pandemic prevalence of chronic pain among children in the US. METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2019 and 2020 National Survey of Children's Health, a web-or mail-based survey representative of children living in the US (n=20,359 in 2019; 29,159 in 2020). Caregiver-reported prevalence of chronic pain was compared between survey years using bivariate and multivariable methods. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic pain among US children decreased from 11 to 8% in the first year of the pandemic. Multivariable analysis adjusting for children's and caregivers' demographics and socioeconomic characteristics confirmed that in 2020, odds of caregiver-reported chronic pain declined by 33% (95% confidence interval: 23%, 42%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The encouraging finding of a nationwide decrease in the prevalence of chronic pain calls into question initial predictions anticipating the pandemic to contribute to onset or persistence of chronic pain among children.

In-person follow-up visit attendance after telemedicine visits.

BACKGROUND: Although Coronavirus disease 2019 rapidly increased the use of telemedicine for pediatric primary care, vaccinations, screening tests, lab draws, and other procedures still require follow-up in-person visits. We investigated in-person follow-up rates after telemedicine visits at our primary care clinic, and what patient or visit characteristics were associated with non-completion of in-person follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of telemedicine visits completed between April and May 2020. A manual chart review was performed to determine which encounters required a follow-up in-person visit; and was tracked through August 2020. Bivariate comparisons were performed according to completion of in-person follow-up and multivariable analysis of follow-up visit attendance was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Of 500 eligible encounters, 16% did not attend at least one in-person follow-up. The median time for follow-up was 2 days (IQR: 1, 6). Patients older than 1 year of age (32%, p= <0.001) and with Medicaid insurance (83%, p=0.019) were more likely to not complete a follow-up visit. The likelihood of completion was higher for Hispanic as compared to non-Hispanic Black patients (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.28, 2.12; p<0.001) and patients requiring routine screening (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.89; p=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Not all required in-person follow-ups were completed after telemedicine visits, which could have negative impacts on children's health. Improving the transition between telemedicine and inperson follow-up of primary care can help ensure the quality of care provided in a telemedicine-first model.

Impact of a Hybrid-Virtual Teaching Model on the Physical Examination Skills of Fourth-Year Medical Students.

ABSTRACT: A required fourth-year advanced core neurology-physical medicine and rehabilitation clerkship was adapted to hybrid format (2-wk remote; 2-wk in-person) during the COVID-19 pandemic. With teaching of the neurological physical examination being shifted to the remote component, we sought to determine whether this negatively affected student performance on an Objective Structured Clinical Examination, particularly the physical examination component. Mean pandemic-era total Objective Structured Clinical Examination scores ( n = 79, 85.1 ± 7.3) were similar to prepandemic era ( n = 137, 83.5 ± 6.0, P = 0.082). Pandemic-era physical examination scores were slightly higher than prepandemic (86.9 ± 6.5 vs. 84.9 ± 6.6). Despite conversion of the clerkship to a hybrid curriculum, the performance of the students on the Objective Structured Clinical Examination and the physical examination were unchanged. Reasons for this lack of change may include the constructiveness and integration of the case-based virtual demonstrations combined with in-person learning or the flexibility of the virtual course to allow students more time to prepare for the Objective Structured Clinical Examination and the physical examination. Our findings demonstrate that a hybrid-virtual model can be used to teach foundational skills such as the basics of the physical examination, while allowing faculty to address higher-order skills such as integration of clinical data with medical knowledge.

Well-child visit attendance of children who have experienced a parental COVID-19 diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of well-child visit (WCV) attendance have significantly decreased. We wanted to see how a parent's positive diagnosis for COVID-19 affected a child's WCV attendance along with other factors. Therefore, we hypothesized that in families with at least 1 positive COVID-19 diagnosis, the rates of WCV attendance would be lower than in families that have not experienced COVID-19. METHODS: Using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 2020, we analyzed sample adult responses for the sample child to questions about last WCV attendance. We included children whose parents completed the survey during quarters 3 and 4 of 2020. The outcome of this study was WCV attendance in the past 12 months with the exposure of interest being parental diagnosis of COVID-19. RESULTS: In our sample (N=1,413), 91% of children attended a WCV in the past 12 months, and 5% had a parent with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis. On adjusted analysis, there was a negative but not statistically significant association between a parent with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis and WCV attendance (OR=0.32; 95% CI: 0.09, 1.20; p=0.092). CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide, there has been a significant decrease in children attending recommended WCVs since the start of the pandemic. Having a parent test positive for COVID-19 may contribute to decreases in WCV attendance in traditional medical office settings. Alternative options exist that may improve WCV attendance; these include telemedicine or virtual visits, as well as visits completed in non-traditional settings such as mobile health clinics and school-based clinics. Further expansion of these options for WCVs must still take into account health disparities that exist among marginalized communities.

Timing and Persistence of Material Hardship Among Children in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Screening for social determinants of health (SDH) has been widely adopted to identify child health risks associated with exposure to material hardship. Whereas SDH screening typically addresses a 12-month span, we sought to compare the prevalence of exposure to present (within the past year) as compared to recent (2-4 years ago) hardship among children in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed the 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation, a nationally representative survey that interviewed participating households annually between 2014 and 2017. We included data from households with children in all waves. As of 2017, households were categorized as (1) experiencing present hardship (within the last year); (2) experiencing recent but not present hardship (any year between 2014 and 2016); and (3) experiencing no hardship over the 4-year period. RESULTS: Of 2422 households, 27% experienced present hardship and 29% experienced recent but not present hardship. Households presently experiencing hardship were more likely to have Medicaid insurance, less likely to be married, and had more children than families who had experienced recent hardship. However, these groups were similar on caregivers' educational attainment, race/ethnicity, language spoken in the home, and age of the youngest child. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that clinical screening tools for SDH that use a 12-month time frame risk missing many children who have recently (within the past 4 years) experienced material hardship and may benefit from interventions to improve social support; a longer time frame could provide clinicians with valuable information for understanding social factors that impact child health and development.

Factors Influencing US Hospital and Medical School Participation in Pediatric COVID-19 Research.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Literature suggests that funding for pediatric clinical trials is inequitably awarded. Furthermore, although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected all hospitals, institutions with already limited resources were more severely impacted. We hypothesized that there would be difference in schools and hospitals that were able to participate in the initial round of pediatric COVID-19 clinical research. METHODS: We searched online databases for preregistered studies using the keywords "COVID-19," "COVID," "SARS-CoV-2," "2019-nCov," "2019 novel coronavirus," and "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2." Search results were limited to studies enrolling participants from birth to 17 years, studies started in 2020, and studies originating in the United states. We calculated the proportion of institutions with active COVID-19 pediatric clinical studies in 2020 and compared institutional characteristics between institutions with and without at least one qualifying COVID-19 study, using rank-sum tests, χ2 tests, or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 150 allopathic medical schools, 34 osteopathic medical schools, and 178 children's hospitals meeting inclusion criteria. Among included institutions, 25% of medical schools and 20% children's hospitals participated in 1 of the registered pediatric COVID-19 studies the year before the study period. Institutions that participated in pediatric COVID-19 studies had more publications, more National Institutes of Health funding, and more studies registered on Clinicaltrials.gov in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the pandemic affecting everyone, participation in early clinical research on the impact of COVID-19 in pediatric populations was concentrated in a few well-resourced institutions that were highly experienced in research.